EARLY PRODUCT DEFINITION LEAD UX DESIGNER & STRATEGIST FEB 2025

Laying the UX Foundation: Rethinking Progress in Therapy

Black downward arrow pointing downward.
A digital interface for a therapy rating system called 'Rating Therapy' with sections for profiles, evaluation, progress, and recommendations, displayed on a blue background, with overlaying wireframes showing different UI screens.

Project Overview

Introduction

Arete Science is a startup on a mission to make data more human — translating it into tools that support real progress for students, educators, and professionals. Over a lively and collaborative four-week sprint, I led a small team of designers to strategize for Arete’s vision: giving clients and therapists smarter ways to track and reflect on progress throughout their work together.

Details

Role: Lead UX Designer & Strategist
Project Type: Early Product Definition
Team: 1 UX Researcher, 2 UX Designers
Tools: Figma, FigJam, Miro, Google Docs
Timeline: Feb-Mar 2025

PROBLEM TO SOLVE

Therapeutic clients looking to improve their mental well-being struggle to assess and track their progress due to a lack of structured, user-friendly systems that provide meaningful, measurable insights and guidance.

Up to 15%

of clients drop out by session three, often due to unclear outcomes


Only 13%

of therapists use structured progress-tracking tools such as PHQ-9 or ORS consistently


A 20-30%

improvement in outcomes can occur with routine progress monitoring, especially for at-risk clients


Solution

By combining thoughtful UX research and strategy with an iterative design approach, we laid the foundation for a web tool that could evolve based on user feedback and usability testing.

We delivered all ux artifacts (research, proto-personas, journey maps, flows, wireframes, light prototyping, and a sample style guide), which shaped the product foundation for Arete.

I specifically owned the evolution of the evaluation center and weekly check-in assessment screens, along with concept UI design and usability testing documents.

“This work is invaluable, thank you for doing this. You’ve really helped open my mind to what’s possible and what areas need more attention.”

- Daniel M. | CEO, Arete Science

1. Evaluation Center - A hub for at-a-glance data for more informed decision-making for client users.

2. Progress Tracking – A simple way for clients to record and reflect on their growth over time.

3. Personalized Therapist Recommendations - to help clients find therapists suited to their needs.

4. Experience Ratings – A structured yet flexible way for clients to provide objective feedback on their therapist.

Challenges I Encountered

New team, tight timeline
With just four weeks and a team of designers who had never worked together before, alignment was critical. I drew on my experience as a small business co-founder to quickly establish shared goals, build trust, and maintain open communication, especially with Arete’s CEO, who remained closely involved throughout.

Shifting scope mid-sprint
As our wireframes brought clarity to the CEO’s vision, the product scope evolved. Features were added, removed, or re-prioritized. This forced us to stay flexible, adjust timelines, and reframe our design efforts without losing momentum.

Design Process

Diagram of a four-step cycle titled 'Lean UX' with each step in a circle. The steps are 'Using Assumptions and Hypotheses to Map Possible Outcomes,' 'Designing the Product,' 'Creating an MVP,' and 'Improving Through Feedback.'

Research & Strategy

I created a concise project scope outlining the timeline and deliverables. Taking a lean approach, we focused on building a light prototype that could be tested early for user feedback and iterative improvements.

While Arete had a vision for what they wanted to achieve and why, the how was elusive to us all. I felt that we needed to lay out all aspects of their suite of other products and consider what made sense for both the users and the needs of the business.  

Using our research and our understanding of Arete as a company, we developed a proto-persona, user journey maps, and a service blueprint that helped to align the user experience with Arete’s broader product ecosystem.

My contributed service blueprint and customer journey map

Core Features & Experience Mapping

Based on research and feedback, we focused on four experience flows:

  • Evaluation Center – a central hub for session reflection and progress tools

  • Post-Session Rating Page – a gentle, structured way for clients to evaluate their experience

  • Recommendations Page – supports therapist comparison and booking consults

  • Progress Dashboardsurfaces helpful tools and data points over time

We mapped user flows for each, centering simplicity, reflection, and transparency. In a follow-up presentation with Arete, our low-fidelity wireframes played a key role in unlocking the next phase of product clarity.

Sample of flows created by Lindsey A. and Laxmi V.

Samples wireframe sketches created by me and Kazaria M.

Mid-Fidelity Wireframes

We went back to the good old pencil and paper and worked out some adjustments to our flows and planning before creating digital wireframes. While my teammates worked to refine their portions, I focused on creating the refined Evaluation Center and Weekly Check-in assessment to finalize our mid-fidelity, grey-scale wireframes and light prototypes. These weren’t polished UI screens; they were functional conversation tools designed to visualize concepts and gather feedback.

Screenshot of an Evaluation Center webpage with a grey sidebar menu containing Profile, Evaluation Center, Progress, Recommendations, and Settings options. The main content includes sections titled Introduction, Local Therapeutic Performance with top therapists listed, Alternative Support with top providers listed, and Overall Client Satisfaction with filters at the bottom.

Stakeholder Feedback

Walking through the prototype with Arete’s CEO sparked major clarity. Several proposed features were deprioritized or restructured, and I gained stronger alignment on what should be validated first. Our visuals played a key role in shifting the product from abstract ideas to testable hypotheses.

My design evolution of the Evaluation Center

Comparison of two digital evaluation center interfaces; left is grayscale and unstyled, right is colorful and styled, both showing a sidebar with menu options, top bar with search, main section with therapist profiles, ratings, client satisfaction data, and graphs.

Results & Learning

Results

  • Delivered user flows and wireframes for 4 key features

  • Built a clickable prototype to clarify direction and drive feedback

  • Helped stakeholders reprioritize features and reframe product goals

  • Created a full usability testing plan to support validation

    If we could continue the work with Arete Science, I would:

  • Facilitating immediate usability testing using the prepared plan and script

  • Using feedback to refine features, rebuild flows, and continue testing

  • Iterating toward a more validated and targeted MVP, ready for launch

What I Learned

You don’t need high-fidelity UI to make meaningful progress. In early-stage projects like this, the most important work often happens upstream in defining the problem, guiding conversations, and building just enough to make ideas tangible.

This project showed how UX strategy and facilitation can unlock clarity and momentum when the path forward is still taking shape.